Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leonard Vander Zee's avatar

I love Barth’s Commentary on Ephesians, but on his theology of the Supper, I would reply along the lines of Flannery O’Connor’s reply to the suggestion that the Eucharist is a symbol. “ Well, toward morning the conversation turned on the Eucharist, which I, being the Catholic, was obviously supposed to defend. Mrs. Broadwater said when she was a child and received the Host, she thought of it as the Holy Ghost, He being the "most portable" person of the Trinity; now she thought of it as a symbol and implied that it was a pretty good one. I then said, in a very shaky voice, "Well, if it's a symbol, to hell with it." That was all the defense I was capable of but I realize now that this is all I will ever be able to say about it, outside of a story, except that it is the center of existence for me; all the rest is expendable.

Expand full comment
Craig Ervin's avatar

Do you like his 2 volume commentary on Ephesians or any of his other works?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts