Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ruth Sutcliffe's avatar

This interpretation would seem to give less support to the use of the passage to view infant baptism and equivalent to circumcision in bringing the child into the covenant community. Calvin argued they were the same, apart from the "relatively minor" (!) difference in outward act. I have always found this a bit dubious. Your thoughts?

Expand full comment
Randy Starkey's avatar

"I think this “circumcision” is a circumcision of the heart performed by the Messiah upon his people!"

I fully agree with that. If we are a new creation in Christ, the flesh is cut away such that we are truly new, albeit still facing temptations from that cut away flesh. So we are not dual natured or schizophrenic! I think the baptism reference is a parallel of the same truth.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts