Eastern Orthodox seem to refer to the text more regularly, not as canonical but as background to understanding the New Testament. Lord of Spirits podcast is an example.
I have a BA in Biblical Studies and a MA in Ministry and not once do I recall ever being taught that 1 Enoch influenced—let alone is quoted—by NT writers. Maybe I missed class that day. Seems pretty important in understanding not just their First Century worldview but how they interpreted OT texts such as who or what the Sons of God are in general 6.
I have a copy translated by R.H. Charles (1855-1931) with a New Introduction by Paula Gooder. Ms Gooder is Canon Theologian of Birmingham and Guildford Cathedrals, Lay Canon at Salisbury Cathedral etc etc.. She states : " ... is essential reading for all who are interested in the origins of Christianity and the beliefs of the first followers of Jesus. It was known and used by some of the earliest churches, and sheds light on many concepts and teachings found in Second Temple Judaism and in the New Testament, including angels, demons, future judgement, 'Son of Man' and the resurrection .. .. .. .. it also reflected a view of the world shared by the majority, if not all, of the New Testament writers. .. .. is thus worth reading in its own right, but is also vitally important for the many ways in which it illuminates the world, language and theology of the New Testament .." Well in that case, given that Paul was the majority writer of the NT, it may be profitable to investigate what if there is any influence or connection with Paul's writings within the canon itself .. blessings ..
Eastern Orthodox seem to refer to the text more regularly, not as canonical but as background to understanding the New Testament. Lord of Spirits podcast is an example.
I have a BA in Biblical Studies and a MA in Ministry and not once do I recall ever being taught that 1 Enoch influenced—let alone is quoted—by NT writers. Maybe I missed class that day. Seems pretty important in understanding not just their First Century worldview but how they interpreted OT texts such as who or what the Sons of God are in general 6.
Exactly! Info worth knowing about.
I have a copy translated by R.H. Charles (1855-1931) with a New Introduction by Paula Gooder. Ms Gooder is Canon Theologian of Birmingham and Guildford Cathedrals, Lay Canon at Salisbury Cathedral etc etc.. She states : " ... is essential reading for all who are interested in the origins of Christianity and the beliefs of the first followers of Jesus. It was known and used by some of the earliest churches, and sheds light on many concepts and teachings found in Second Temple Judaism and in the New Testament, including angels, demons, future judgement, 'Son of Man' and the resurrection .. .. .. .. it also reflected a view of the world shared by the majority, if not all, of the New Testament writers. .. .. is thus worth reading in its own right, but is also vitally important for the many ways in which it illuminates the world, language and theology of the New Testament .." Well in that case, given that Paul was the majority writer of the NT, it may be profitable to investigate what if there is any influence or connection with Paul's writings within the canon itself .. blessings ..
And correlation does not equal causation