Several years ago I wrote an article on a “modified reformed view” of justification for a great “views” book on Justification edited by James Beilby and Paul Rhodes. It was a great volume, a terrific conversation about justification from some different perspectives, I really enjoyed it.
This looks good, except for the word "acquit." I'm going with Gordon Fee that acquittal cannot be what Paul means because acquittal would mean that the believer is actually innocent of any wrongdoing, but such a person then would not need God to do anything.
How can we live Whit out sing
This looks good, except for the word "acquit." I'm going with Gordon Fee that acquittal cannot be what Paul means because acquittal would mean that the believer is actually innocent of any wrongdoing, but such a person then would not need God to do anything.
Thanks for this explanation. This definitions is really helpful to understand justification nowadays.
Thanks, very helpful, balanced synopsis!