9 Comments
User's avatar
Richard Scheenstra's avatar

I suspect Paul would have thought of himself as serving an alternative kingdom rather than empire, but everything Morgan says still applies. Paul's language reminds me again of the importance of imagination in Christian discipleship. I've suspected for some time that while "in Christ" can and does mean many things, it's Paul's way of saying "in the kingdom," which is why he refers specifically to the kingdom of God so infrequently.

Expand full comment
Michael F. Bird's avatar

Richard, well put!

Expand full comment
Brian M.'s avatar

If I didn’t know any better me thinks you just solidified my view of either Episcopacy or Presbyteria polities. 😂

Sorry Baptists. Check mate. 😜

Expand full comment
Michael F. Bird's avatar

Victory!

Expand full comment
Don Williams's avatar

Paul did declare himself a citizen of Rome

Wasn’t that why he was sent to Rome for a trial?

Expand full comment
Michael F. Bird's avatar

He also appealed to the Emperor to exonerate him.

Expand full comment
Moyer Hubbard's avatar

Fascinating. I wonder if Morgan's approach might provide fodder for Christian nationalists like Doug Wilson or Christian Wolfe. Of course, that is not an argument against it, just simmering concern.

Expand full comment
Michael F. Bird's avatar

I don't think so, since that was part of Paul's apostolic office.

Expand full comment
Ian Packer's avatar

Mike, I wonder if you could convince any of your friends at Baker Academic (or elsewhere) to publish a paperback version (like they have with Brill and other expensive publications).

Expand full comment