8 Comments
May 20Liked by Michael F. Bird

I suspect Paul would have thought of himself as serving an alternative kingdom rather than empire, but everything Morgan says still applies. Paul's language reminds me again of the importance of imagination in Christian discipleship. I've suspected for some time that while "in Christ" can and does mean many things, it's Paul's way of saying "in the kingdom," which is why he refers specifically to the kingdom of God so infrequently.

Expand full comment
author

Richard, well put!

Expand full comment
May 23Liked by Michael F. Bird

If I didn’t know any better me thinks you just solidified my view of either Episcopacy or Presbyteria polities. 😂

Sorry Baptists. Check mate. 😜

Expand full comment
author

Victory!

Expand full comment
May 20Liked by Michael F. Bird

Paul did declare himself a citizen of Rome

Wasn’t that why he was sent to Rome for a trial?

Expand full comment
author

He also appealed to the Emperor to exonerate him.

Expand full comment
May 20Liked by Michael F. Bird

Fascinating. I wonder if Morgan's approach might provide fodder for Christian nationalists like Doug Wilson or Christian Wolfe. Of course, that is not an argument against it, just simmering concern.

Expand full comment
author

I don't think so, since that was part of Paul's apostolic office.

Expand full comment